A Land Facing Both Ways –
Review of Ari Shavit’s My Promised Land: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel

I have read a fair amount
of essays and books on this important nation and they, for the most part, tend
to be well-researched and fun to read. However, these books tend to be hampered
either by: i) being written by insiders with an agenda to push or an ax to
grind – the worst of the lot tend to be little more than partisan screeds; or
ii) an objective and dispassionate observation penned by an outsider who
struggles to muster the same level of passion or intimacy that insiders can.
This new book by Ari Shavit (a celebrated writer at the Israeli left-of-center
paper: Haaretz) seems to be the Holy
Grail: a book by an insider that manages to be both passionate and objective
and which examines the country in a deeply personal way: warts and all.
This book has many virtues
to commend it. Mr. Shavit displays a deep love for his country, a love so deep
that while he celebrates its triumphs and strengths he is also willing to
explore his country’s shortcomings. Mr. Shavit narrates in very honest terms
the expulsion of over 50,000 Palestinian Arabs from Lydda and Ramle in 1948,
after both towns fell to the army of the new State of Israel. These towns were
resettled by the victors, the empty houses of the vanquished occupied by new
immigrants and the towns given new names of Lod and Ramla respectively. This
was an event so indelibly etched in Arab minds that they refer to it as al-Nakba (“the catastrophe”). While not
papering over this tragic event, it is important to put the event in historical
context. Earlier in that decade, paragons of human rights such as the United
States and the United Kingdom committed acts that top the incident at Lydda.
While the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima & Nagasaki is well known, the arguably
needless joint British and American aerial bombing of Dresden in the waning
months of the 2nd world war left over 25,000 people dead (most of
them civilians).
Mr. Shavit also charts (in
a deeply personal way using his family’s history) the story and evolution of
the state of Israel. We are swept from the days of Theodore Herzl’s publication
in 1895 of Der Judenstaat (“the
Jewish State”), a pamphlet arguing for the creation of the Jewish State, then to
the early days of the immigrant farmers in the Kibbutzim, and their famed Jaffa
Oranges. He lays out the evolution of the country from a few immigrants toiling
in the Kibbutzim of the early 20th century to the wave of
immigration from the survivors of the holocaust in Europe and the pogroms of
the Middle East in the 1940s and 1950s , to the emergence of the settlements
movement in the 1970s and finally to the sophistication of the modern day.
A particularly touching
part of the book which I believe has universal appeal is the description of
Bizaron, a classic housing estate similar to many built in the 1950s to accommodate
the thousands of immigrants streaming into the young country. These immigrants
from Europe and the Middle East all had a few things in common: they had all suffered
traumatic or near-death experiences, lost a great deal of their material possessions
on their flight to Israel and, almost to a man, had to settle into jobs beneath
their status in their prior lives. Recognizing that they would probably not
reach their full potential, these people turned their efforts to educating
their children to attain their fullest potential. These children of “down-on-their
luck” immigrants achieved great strides: president of the Supreme Court of
Israel, millionaire and billionaire entrepreneurs and many distinguished
academics at various leading universities globally. This is a universal and classic
immigrant story. Immigrant lore is replete with tales of the Nigerian doctor
working as a healthcare assistant in Baltimore, the lawyer from Nepal driving a
cab in Manhattan or the Ukrainian nuclear physicist working as a bookkeeper for
a small firm in Queens. The high-energy and zealously-educated children of
these people end up being disproportionately represented in high-powered
positions in Corporate America.
Some of Mr. Shavit’s more potentially controversial statements revolve around the issue of
Israeli settlement building, an enterprise which he vigorously opposes. The
writer describes these settlements as “pregnancies outside the womb” and
predicts that runaway settlement activity and ultra-nationalism
exemplified by zealots such as Yehuda Etzion, a right wing activist previously
imprisoned for a foiled plan to blow up the Dome of the Rock, will present
challenges for the continued success of the country. Finally, summing up the
essence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict he talks about a continued conflict
that leaves both sides worse off and unleashes a wave of everyday evildoing by
non-evil people (in his own words “evil can take place without a need for evil
people”). This section of the book is reminiscent of Hannah Arendt’s theory of
the banality of evil.
All said, a great read
and highly informative book that makes a gallant effort of being even-handed
and balanced. Reading Mr. Shavit’s book I am reminded of the phrase: “militant centrist”,
which I think is an apt description of the man.